From: Yan Jun
<medp1128@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February, 2019 22:04
To: SUPCOURT Registry (SUPCOURT) <SUPCOURT_Registry@supcourt.gov.sg>
Cc: QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg) <STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg>; AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg) <AGC@agc.gov.sg>; Yong Feng Chin (chin_yong_feng@spf.gov.sg) <chin_yong_feng@spf.gov.sg>; Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg) <wanbao@sph.com.sg>; news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com) <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg) <shinmin@sph.com.sg>; Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg) <stforum@sph.com.sg>; Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg) <voices@mediacorp.com.sg>; Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg) <zblocal@sph.com.sg>
Subject: Request for probable cause examination against arbitrary arrest
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February, 2019 22:04
To: SUPCOURT Registry (SUPCOURT) <SUPCOURT_Registry@supcourt.gov.sg>
Cc: QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg) <STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg>; AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg) <AGC@agc.gov.sg>; Yong Feng Chin (chin_yong_feng@spf.gov.sg) <chin_yong_feng@spf.gov.sg>; Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg) <wanbao@sph.com.sg>; news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com) <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg) <shinmin@sph.com.sg>; Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg) <stforum@sph.com.sg>; Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg) <voices@mediacorp.com.sg>; Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg) <zblocal@sph.com.sg>
Subject: Request for probable cause examination against arbitrary arrest
Dear
Supreme Court and the State Courts,
- I refer to my report made to the SPF on Feb 12, 2019 at 18:48 with regard to a tenant-landlord dispute.
- In response to my report, two
police officers arrived and then 4 more officer arrived to investigate the
case under Assistant Superintendent (ASP) Tang Ru Long from Hougang police
station. While Staff Sargant Muhd Salamun insisted that I be put under
constant surveillance, he refused to let me the legal basis of his action
and my question about what illegal activities I have engaged. He insisted
on keeping accompany with me to the toilet and stayed in my room when I
asked him to stay outside.
- ASP Tang Ru Long told me the
so-called landlord, who I saw for the first time on Feb 12 at 18:45, asked
me to leave immediately. I told him to police should not get involved in a
tenant - landlord dispute but suggested that I leave the flat before 10am
of Feb 13, 2019.
- Finally, the landlord ask ASP
to take action within 30 minutes, at about 22:05. ASP Tang had no
objection.
- I don’t think ASP Tang Ru Long
is supposed to get involved in a tenant – landlord. He should provide me
with sufficient time to settle this tenant-landlord dispute. All police
officers have refused to tell me the criminal offence I have engaged in
but insisted they should put me under surveillance.
- If police arrest me today, I
would request the State Court to order the police to bring me before a
Magistrate in accordance with Article 9(4) of the Constitution of
Singapore, or a citizen’s right against arbitrary arrest.
- The case number is
F/20190212/0171. I firmly believe that intelligence division is involved
in this matter.
- Thank you.
Regards,
Yan Jun
(S7684361I)
没有评论:
发表评论
注意:只有此博客的成员才能发布评论。