My 15th letter to PM Lee Hsien Loong on Jun 17, 2020

Attachment: Espionage in China

From: Yan Jun
Sent: 17 June, 2020 17:01
To: Lee Hsien Loong (PM)
Cc: AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); CHIA Jin Ming Benjamin (SPS, B cluster); Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg); Eng Chye Tan (uprsec@nus.edu.sg); FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (SPS, B4); Hong Choon Chua (IMH); HOONG Wee Teck (SPF); Jean Paul THIERY (bchtjp@nus.edu.sg); K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs); LEE Chien Earn (CGH); LOH Hong Wai (SPS, B5); Middle East Institute (contact.mei@nus.edu.sg); Nigel Tan Choon Kiat (NTU); PM Office (pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg); QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; Subra SURESH (NTU); SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); Tan Bin Kiat (SPS, B2); TAN Chun-Yuan Avryl (SPS, B3); WEE Lian-Chyuan Wilfred (SPS, B1); ¹ã¶«Ê¡ÈËÃñÕþ¸®(service@gd.gov.cn); Chief Executive's Office_HK (ceo@ceo.gov.hk); HK Customs and Excise Department (customsenquiry@customs.gov.hk); Alejandro Ponce (The World Justice Project); Sofie Arjon Schutte (U4 Anti-corruption resource centre); Buscaglia Edgardo (Columbia University); Garry Rodan (Murdoch University); Matthew Stephenson (mstephen@law.harvard.edu); S.T. Quah Jon (National University of Singapore); Silverstein Gordon (Yale University) ; Susan Rose Ackerman (Yale University); 'Freedom House'; info@article19.org; mail@globalwitness.org; 'Mickey Spiegel (Human Right Watch)'; 'Phil Robertson (Human Right Watch)'; Yu Hah Ming (mingyu.hah@amnesty.org); Gail Davidson (Lawyers Rights Watch Canada); International Association of Judges; Talia Dove (International Bar Association); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'; Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (cfaenquiries@hkcfa.hk); Supreme Court of Canada (reception@scc-csc.ca); Supreme Court of India (supremecourt@nic.in); Supreme Court of New Zealand (supremecourt@justice.govt.nz); Supreme Court of South Africa (PaMyburgh@justice.gov.za); The Privy Council (enquiries@supremecourt.uk); Indonesia Embassy (singapura.kbri@kemlu.go.id); Myanmar Embassy (ambassador@myanmarembassy.sg); Philippines Embassy (philippine.embassy.singapore@gmail.com); Thailand Embassy (thaisgp@singnet.com.sg); Vietnam Embassy (vnemb.sg@mofa.gov.vn); Argentina Embassy (consulares_eisia@mrecic.gov.ar); Brazil Embassy (brasemb.cingapura@itamaraty.gov.br); Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg); Saudi Arabia Embassy (sgemb@mofa.gov.sa); South Africa Embassy (singapore.consular@dirco.gov.za); South Korea Embassy (korembsg@mofa.go.kr); Turkey Embassy (embassy.singapore@mfa.gov.tr); Australia Embassy (info.ausg@vfshelpline.com); Canada Embassy (spore@international.gc.ca); German Embassy (info@singapur.diplo.de); Italy Embassy (ambasciata.singapore@esteri.it); Japan Embassy (infoculture@sn.mofa.go.jp); US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov)
Subject: My complaint about Changi Prison

Dear PM Lee Hsien Loong,

The main purpose of this email is to request the PM to deal with my complaint about Changi Prison’s oppressive and inhuman rule before the coming General election (GE).

As explained in the paragraphs set out below, I can send this email tomorrow but prefer to send it today out of prudence.

Manipulation of COVID-19 by the PAP government

In my email to the PM on Apr 23, 2020, I claimed that the PAP government had purposely played up the COVID-19 situation by an extension of the circuit breaker period from May 4 to Jun 1 to downplay its wrongdoing.

Now the government is going to manipulate COVID-19 situation again by playing it down to hold the GE as soon as possible, preferably in early July. However, Changi Prison’s oppressive rule will seriously affect the outcome of the coming GE.

The government’s plan 

The government is going to ignore the misconduct on the part of Changi Prison on the grounds that I have failed to lodge the complaint within 3 months.

On Mar 21, I complained to the State Courts about the Changi Prison and asked the prison for the CCTV footage of the assault I suffered on Dec 20, 2019. At the end of the email, I claimed that I would “ask PM Lee Hsien Loong for it if I cannot get it before I write to the international community”. Since I was released on Mar 18 and didn’t suffer serious injuries, I am supposed to lodge a complaint to the PM in a reasonable period of time, for example, 3 months.

As for my health condition, the tenants in the flat that I am living in, or the informants for the government, have already hacked my fitness tracking watch several times by resetting the password to collect the necessary data such as my blood pressures and heart rates. The hospitals are supposed to take the side of the government so the results of medical examinations should always be favourable, which explains why Dr. Kiat Tan at Changi General Hospital maliciously declined to ordered me a brain CT on Mar 16, 2020.

I have enough reason to believe that the government will proceed to hold the GE in early July, if I fail to complain the prison to the PM by Jun 18, or 3 months after I was released. In fact, the landlord of the flat even reminded me that some Singaporeans could receive hundred dollars from the government on Jun 18. The recent announcement of the start of phase 2 re-opening on Jun 19 could be used to fool me into sending this email after Jun 18. 

The cause of the assault in Changi Prison

The cause of the assault was an experiment carried out by Changi Prison on me. The experiment was designed to put me in B2 institution but under the supervision of a B4 officer (Looi Weihao). The purpose of this experiment was to find out whether the strong criticism in my email to the PM on Sep 11, 2019 against B4 was biased towards B2 because of the privileges provided to me by Supt. Tan Bin Kiat, the person in charge of B2. In retaliation, 3 inmates including inmate Goh assaulted me on Dec 20, 2020 because they thought it was me who drove their fellow gangster Yong Hui out of cell 722 of B2 on Dec 18. The prison deliberately brought in Inmate Yong Hui in the cell 722 on Dec13 against my will to counter me but didn’t expect the assault. 

Changi Prison has mistakenly believed that prison guards should treat every inmate equally. The prison has a duty to ensure the safety of each inmate, so prison guards must treat inmates differently. When I was detained in Housing Unit 1, prison officers intentionally punished me in the hope that gangsters wouldn’t harass me. The gangsters wouldn’t have harassed me if they had known that prison took my safety seriously.  

The espionage activities involving in the PAP government

On Jun 5, I wrote a letter to Guangdong Provincial Public Security Department in which I blamed Princess International Express, a Chinese transportation company, for engaging in espionage involving the PAP government.

While Guangdong Provincial Public Security Department and Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau are unlikely to respond to my report, I still back my espionage allegations and provide further information in the attached file.

In the attached file, I have set out the grounds for my suspicion that the PAP government has manipulated my immediate family members in my hometown in Hubei Province. I understand that they have a lot in common with the PAP government and would appreciate it if the PAP government informs them not to contact me in any way. I am going to return to Changi Prison soon.

The US government: democracy vs espionage activities

The US government has a tradition to promote democracy by protecting fundamental human rights such as the right of suffrage and the right to free expression. It is well-established in the West that democracy is equivalent to a government by the people but not a government for the people. Since the former but not the latter is founded on universal suffrage, universal suffrage is the foundation of democracy but not autocracy. That explains why protesters in Hong Kong are fighting hard for universal suffrage.

No one can deny that Singapore has free and fair elections when it comes to polling-day procedures, and Members of the Parliament are elected through such elections. While the universal suffrage is supposed to make Singapore stay away from autocratic rule and corruption at the highest level, the PAP government has already acquiesced to my repeated allegations of totalitarian/autocratic rule. 

The PAP government serves as a good example of universal suffrage based autocratic government. As such, the US government is wrong to see the right of suffrage as a fundamental human right. As discussed in a democracy essay at page 53 “The people elect a government which is to govern according to justice, not an executive to do the people’s will”. The objectively ascertainable common good that the people are able to know is fundamental justice.

In response to my repeated protests, an average Singaporean is supposed to cast doubts on the PAP’s “excellent” governance. None of them has voiced their concerns in public. It is self-evident that the damage to the reputation of the PAP will deny the greatness of the country and subsequently call into question the established credentials of Singapore as a reliable business hub. The best option for opposition parties is to take the side with the PAP for the best interest of the people. In sharp contrast to the common sense that an autocratic country cannot last long, the PAP’s totalitarian rule has repeatedly won Singapore a reputation of the most competitive country in the world.

All of these have happened because the fall of the PAP government will serve as perfect example to discredit the values of liberal democracy. It will be hard for the US government to explain why a government by the people can be a totalitarian regime, which explains why the most powerful democratic government has taken no action against the PAP.

I have enough reason to believe that US intelligence officers had approached me in hope of persuading me to give up my protests. I had already talked to this senior officer at Memory Guesthouse in Johor Bahru of Malaysia on the night of Oct 16, 2019. He went back to Singapore to report me to his supervisor the next day. Only with the help of Malaysia intelligence, he was able to approach me properly in Johor Bahru.  On Nov 12, a Malaysian intelligence office at DIY HomeStay (Block A, #10-10, Bayu Puteri Apartment 2, Taman Bayu Puteri, 80150, Johor) tried to push me back to Memory  House but failed.

In my email to the PM on Nov 20, 2019, I blamed a Malaysian citizen Yap Foo Beng for engaging in espionage for the PAP government. He must be a Malaysian national security/intelligence officer and worked with his colleagues for Malaysian government. When I reported Yap at a police station on Oct 15, a female national security officer was there with a child to overhear my complaint and heard my false belief that Yap was working for Singapore government. Subsequently, these national security officers claimed that they were from Singapore on Oct 31 when they maliciously compete with me to rent a room in Johor Bahru (4*, Janlan Perjiranan 10/21, Bandar Dato Onn, 81100) to put me under surveillance.

I have solid evidence to stand by my espionage allegations against both the Malaysian and the US government. The Malaysian and the US government may wish to respond to my allegations.

My requests

I would request the PM to deal with my complaint about Changi Prison’s oppressive rule and to direct the prison to provide me with the CCTV footage of the incident.

I also request the PM to respond in public before the coming GE a number of my allegations including the PAP’s manipulation of the COVID-19 situation and espionage activities in China.   

Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun