My 13th letter to PM Lee Hsien Loong

Attachment: Attachment _13th letter

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 3:50 PM
To: Lee Hsien Loong (PM)
Cc: Chief Executive's Office_HK (ceo@ceo.gov.hk); HK Customs and Excise Department (customsenquiry@customs.gov.hk); AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg); Eng Chye Tan (uprsec@nus.edu.sg); FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (faisal_mustaffa@pris.gov.sg); Hong Choon Chua (hong_choon_chua@imh.com.sg); HOONG Wee Teck; Jean Paul THIERY (bchtjp@nus.edu.sg); K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs); KOO Boon Wah (SPS); Kumar Gupta Dhanesh (gmsdk@nus.edu.sg); Lee Chien Earn (CGH); Mandarin Self Storage (hougang@mandarinselfstorage.com.sg); Middle East Institute (contact.mei@nus.edu.sg); PM Office (pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg); QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); Tan Bin Kiat (SPS) (tan_bin_kiat@pris.gov.sg); helpdesk@gdexpress.com; swsam@ymail.com; Alejandro Ponce (The World Justice Project); Sofie Arjon Schutte (U4 Anti-corruption resource centre); Yuri Fedotov (United Nations Office on Drug and Crime); Buscaglia Edgardo (Columbia University); Garry Rodan (Murdoch University); Matthew Stephenson (mstephen@law.harvard.edu); S.T. Quah Jon (National University of Singapore); Silverstein Gordon (Yale University) ; Susan Rose Ackerman (Yale University); 'Freedom House'; Human Rights First (feedback@humanrightsfirst.org); info@article19.org; mail@globalwitness.org; 'Mickey Spiegel (Human Right Watch)'; 'Phil Robertson (Human Right Watch)'; Yu Hah Ming (mingyu.hah@amnesty.org); Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (cfaenquiries@hkcfa.hk); Supreme Court of Canada (reception@scc-csc.ca); Supreme Court of India (supremecourt@nic.in); Supreme Court of New Zealand (supremecourt@justice.govt.nz); Supreme Court of South Africa (PaMyburgh@justice.gov.za); The Privy Council (enquiries@supremecourt.uk); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'; Indonesia Embassy (info@indonesianembassy.sg); Myanmar Embassy (ambassador@myanmarembassy.sg); Philippines Embassy (philippine.embassy.singapore@gmail.com); Thailand Embassy (thaisgp@singnet.com.sg); Vietnam Embassy (vnemb.sg@mofa.gov.vn); Argentina Embassy (consulares_eisia@mrecic.gov.ar); Brazil Embassy (brasemb.cingapura@itamaraty.gov.br); Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg); Saudi Arabia Embassy (sgemb@mofa.gov.sa); South Africa Embassy (singapore.consular@dirco.gov.za); South Korea Embassy (korembsg@mofa.go.kr); Turkey Embassy (embassy.singapore@mfa.gov.tr); Australia Embassy (info.ausg@vfshelpline.com); Canada Embassy (spore@international.gc.ca); German Embassy (info@singapur.diplo.de); Italy Embassy (ambasciata.singapore@esteri.it); Japan Embassy (infoculture@sn.mofa.go.jp); US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov)
Subject: Protest at Raffle Place (Nov 20, 2019, 5pm)

Dear PM Lee Hsien Loong,

I refer to my email dated Sep 11, 2019 about the PAP government’s cunning plan for General Election (GE) 2019.

I am going to stage a protest at the central square outside Raffle Place MRT station on Nov 20 at 5pm. Right now. I am at the central square with my luggage.  

I had planned to protest during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s state visit to Singapore, but I am not sure whether the president will come to Singapore or not. I’d better choose the time that works best for me.

Since Singapore’s legal system is totally corrupt, I have no intention of applying for any protest permit. If the government see my protest as illegal, police can easily arrest me on the spot. I do not accept any move-on direction issued by police. Police have no right and are unable to change my mindset. 

I will copy this email to Commissioner of Police Hoong Wee Teck and Singapore Police Force. Unlike other criminals, I have already provided enough information for the police to charge me with “unlawful Assembly”. It is evident that there is no need for police to carry out any investigation into my case by asking me questions. I will exercise my right to silence after police arrest me. 

The PAP’s espionage activities in Malaysia

On Oct 15, 2019, I lodged a complaint by email to GD Express, an international transportation company, of stolen package in connection with an employee of this company and copied the email to the international media.

In this email, I mentioned that the PAP government was going to use former US President Barack Obama's Singapore talk on Dec 16, 2019 to showcase the US government’s support to it. I still stand by my words.

Yap Foo Beng, a Malaysian citizen, was caught for conducting espionage activities for the PAP government in Johor Barhu of Malaysia. On Oct 15, I lodged a police report at Iskandar Pureri police station in Malaysia.

PAP’s totalitarian rule

I explained in detail in the attached file why the PAP's rule is totalitarian and why North Korean is more democratic than Singapore. One can easily prove me wrong by giving an example of judicial corruption on the part of the Supreme Court of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in which fundamental justice has been denied to each of its people.

If the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had passed a law which requires husbands to pay maintenance to wives who have misconducted themselves during the course of marriage, the CCP government would have already been toppled long time ago.

A misunderstanding of universal values

It is self-evident that something has gone wrong with Singapore’s legal system because the PAP government has steadfastly refused to charge me with Contempt of Court in repose to my repeated public protests since end of 2015 against the corrupt legal system.

Transparency International has still ranked Singapore the least corrupt country in Asia since 2016. The UN Human Rights Council and other NGOs turned their back on the issue of judicial corruption in Singapore. This fact can be easily explained by the NGO’s misunderstanding of universal values.

The universal value is the right to justice but not the human rights. No right to justice, no human rights. While human rights activists emphasize the importance of liberty, most people don’t need much liberty. It is out of respect for justice that small number of people fight relentlessly for liberty.

Unlike human rights, justice would shine like a jewel for itself. In fact, the administration of justice doesn’t require judicial independence. Although Singapore’s legal system is completely in favor of the PAP government, one can still expose the massive judicial corruption on the part of the highest court to the outside world on his own strength.   

Media bias

The Western media has widely reported on Hong Kong protests but ignored my protests. It is evident that the Western media is helping the PAP government by hiding its totalitarian rule from its people in case the PAP is voted out in the coming GE.

I am surprised to read the report saying The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 was unanimously passed in the US House of Representatives on October 15, 2019. Unless the protesters in Hong Kong can successfully take on the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, their protests are bound to fail. What the senators ought to consider is a bill of human rights and democracy for people in Singapore.

Unlike Hong Kongers, Singaporeans have universal suffrage. With this right, Singaporeans have legitimized the PAP’s totalitarian rule for several decades. For Hong Kongers, most likely they will seek Hong Kong independence by making a revolution of their times after they obtain universal suffrage.

The right to vote is not an absolute right and can be easily misused. It can help Singaporeans support a totalitarian rule and help Hong Kongers seek independence, which is against justice.

My request

I understand that PM is now in Mexico. You intelligence officer has got the information that I wouldn’t protest today. I have changed my mind.

I would like to request PM Lee to respond in public to my allegations of judicial corruption, espionage activities and totalitarian rule.

I think the PAP should step down in the best interest of Singapore.

Regards,

Yan Jun