My 12th letter to PM Lee Hsien Loong_Government's plan for GE 2019

 Attachment: Government's plan for GE 2019

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Wednesday, 11 September, 2019 07:20
To: Lee Hsien Loong (PM) <lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg>
Cc: AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg) <AGC@agc.gov.sg>; CHEE Yam Cheng (Singapore Medical Council) <yam_cheng_chee@ttsh.com.sg>; Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg) <desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg>; Eng Chye Tan (uprsec@nus.edu.sg) <uprsec@nus.edu.sg>; FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (faisal_mustaffa@pris.gov.sg) <faisal_mustaffa@pris.gov.sg>; Gan Kim Yong (Minister for Health) <gan_kim_yong@moh.gov.sg>; Hong Choon Chua (hong_choon_chua@imh.com.sg) <hong_choon_chua@imh.com.sg>; Jean Paul THIERY (bchtjp@nus.edu.sg) <bchtjp@nus.edu.sg>; K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs) <k_shanmugam@mha.gov.sg>; KOO Boon Wah (SPS) <koo_boon_wah@pris.gov.sg>; Kumar Gupta Dhanesh (gmsdk@nus.edu.sg) <gmsdk@nus.edu.sg>; Lee Chien Earn (CGH) <lee.chien.earn@singhealth.com.sg>; Lim Wei Kiat (SPS) <lim_wei_kiat@pris.gov.sg>; Looi Wei Hao (SPS) <looi_wei_hao@pris.gov.sg>; Mandarin Self Storage (hougang@mandarinselfstorage.com.sg) <hougang@mandarinselfstorage.com.sg>; Middle East Institute (contact.mei@nus.edu.sg) <contact.mei@nus.edu.sg>; PM Office (pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg) <pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg>; QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg) <STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg>; SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT) <SUPCOURT_QSM@supcourt.gov.sg>; Tan Bin Kiat (SPS) (tan_bin_kiat@pris.gov.sg) <tan_bin_kiat@pris.gov.sg>; Chief Executive's Office_HK (ceo@ceo.gov.hk) <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>; HK Customs and Excise Department (customsenquiry@customs.gov.hk) <customsenquiry@customs.gov.hk>; Alejandro Ponce (The World Justice Project) <aponce@worldjusticeproject.org>; Sofie Arjon Schutte (U4 Anti-corruption resource centre) <sofie.schuette@cmi.no>; Yuri Fedotov (United Nations Office on Drug and Crime) <yury.fedotov@unodc.org>; 'Buscaglia Edgardo (Columbia University)' <ebuscaglia@law.columbia.edu>; 'Garry Rodan (Murdoch University)' <G.Rodan@murdoch.edu.au>; Matthew Stephenson (mstephen@law.harvard.edu) <mstephen@law.harvard.edu>; 'S.T. Quah Jon (National University of Singapore)' <jonstquah@gmail.com>; 'Silverstein Gordon (Yale University) ' <gradpro.law@yale.edu>; 'Susan Rose Ackerman (Yale University)' <susan.rose-ackerman@yale.edu>; 'Freedom House' <info@freedomhouse.org>; Human Rights First (feedback@humanrightsfirst.org) <feedback@humanrightsfirst.org>; info@article19.org; mail@globalwitness.org; 'Mickey Spiegel (Human Right Watch)' <spiegem@hrw.org>; 'Phil Robertson (Human Right Watch)' <RobertP@hrw.org>; Yu Hah Ming (mingyu.hah@amnesty.org) <mingyu.hah@amnesty.org>; 'Elizabeth Andersen (American Bar of Association)' <elizabeth.andersen@americanbar.org>; 'Gail Davidson (Lawyers Rights Watch Canada)' <lrwc@portal.ca>; 'International Association of Judges' <Judicial.Independence.wp@gmail.com>; 'Talia Dove (International Bar Association)' <talia.dove@int-bar.org>; Australia High Court (jsmart@hcourt.gov.au) <jsmart@hcourt.gov.au>; Federal Court of Malaysia (webmaster@kehakiman.gov.my) <webmaster@kehakiman.gov.my>; Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (cfaenquiries@hkcfa.hk) <cfaenquiries@hkcfa.hk>; Supreme Court of Canada (reception@scc-csc.ca) <reception@scc-csc.ca>; Supreme Court of India (supremecourt@nic.in) <supremecourt@nic.in>; Supreme Court of New Zealand (supremecourt@justice.govt.nz) <supremecourt@justice.govt.nz>; Supreme Court of South Africa (PaMyburgh@justice.gov.za) <PaMyburgh@justice.gov.za>; The Privy Council (enquiries@supremecourt.uk) <enquiries@supremecourt.uk>; Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg) <wanbao@sph.com.sg>; news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com) <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg) <shinmin@sph.com.sg>; Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg) <stforum@sph.com.sg>; Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg) <voices@mediacorp.com.sg>; Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg) <zblocal@sph.com.sg>; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk) <hkja@hkja.org.hk>; Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com) <mingpao@mingpao.com>; Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc) <news@odn.on.cc>; SCMP (letters@scmp.com) <letters@scmp.com>; Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) <localnews@singtao.com>; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk) <editor@thestandard.com.hk>; Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw) <service@taiwannews.com.tw>; United Daily News (newspro@udn.com) <newspro@udn.com>; Indonesia Embassy (info@indonesianembassy.sg) <info@indonesianembassy.sg>; Laos Embassy (laoembsg@singnet.com.sg) <laoembsg@singnet.com.sg>; Myanmar Embassy (ambassador@myanmarembassy.sg) <ambassador@myanmarembassy.sg>; Philippines Embassy (philippine.embassy.singapore@gmail.com) <philippine.embassy.singapore@gmail.com>; Thailand Embassy (thaisgp@singnet.com.sg) <thaisgp@singnet.com.sg>; Vietnam Embassy (vnemb.sg@mofa.gov.vn) <vnemb.sg@mofa.gov.vn>; Argentina Embassy (consulares_eisia@mrecic.gov.ar) <consulares_eisia@mrecic.gov.ar>; Brazil Embassy (brasemb.cingapura@itamaraty.gov.br) <brasemb.cingapura@itamaraty.gov.br>; Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg) <russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg>; Saudi Arabia Embassy (sgemb@mofa.gov.sa) <sgemb@mofa.gov.sa>; South Africa Embassy (singapore.consular@dirco.gov.za) <singapore.consular@dirco.gov.za>; South Korea Embassy (korembsg@mofa.go.kr) <korembsg@mofa.go.kr>; Turkey Embassy (embassy.singapore@mfa.gov.tr) <embassy.singapore@mfa.gov.tr>; Australia Embassy (enquiries-sg@dfat.gov.au) <enquiries-sg@dfat.gov.au>; Canada Embassy (spore@international.gc.ca) <spore@international.gc.ca>; German Embassy (info@singapur.diplo.de) <info@singapur.diplo.de>; Italy Embassy (ambasciata.singapore@esteri.it) <ambasciata.singapore@esteri.it>; Japan Embassy (infoculture@sn.mofa.go.jp) <infoculture@sn.mofa.go.jp>; US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov) <singaporeusembassy@state.gov>
Subject: Government's plan about GE 2019

Dear PM Lee Hsien Loong,

I refer to my email dated Feb 28, 2019 about my protest at Raffle Place MRT station. I was sentenced to 35 weeks on Apr 17, and was released on Aug 13, 2019.

The upcoming General Election (GE) 2019

On Sep 4, 2019 at 4:46pm, I sent an email to the media about the PAP government’s plan for the upcoming General Election (GE) 2019. On the same day at 5:02pm, the mainstream newspaper Straits Times reported that PM Lee had convened the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC), the first step towards the upcoming GE.

It is evident that there was a causal connection between my disclosure of the government’s secret plan and the announcement of EBRC, as the GE is not a light matter. 

In the email, I claimed that the PAP government was scared of my continued protests so planned to end my protest for good by holding a GE before Chinese President Xi Jinping’s reciprocal state visit to Singapore later this year. I explained this plan in great detail in the attached file.

To that end, two preparations were made. One preparation was the announcement of PM Lee’s stepping down under the guise of an interview with Nikkei Asian Review in the context of G20 Osaka Summit, which served as a bait to lure me into going on a protest after the announcement of the GE.

The other preparation was my appeal hearing scheduled for Jul 26, 2019, which was meant to release me from the court and to make my February protest public through mainstream newspapers.

If I protested shortly after Parliament was dissolved, the government would arrest me and then proceeded with nomination and voting activities. If Parliament were dissolved at the end of September, the GE would be held in October. President Xi’s visit were expected to take place after the GE. It was meant to counter the destructive effect produced by my protests on the PAP government by showcasing good relations between Singapore and China.

In the attached file, I provided conclusive evidence of the direct involvement of Supreme Court by a forced appeal hearing in this political intrigue. Since judicial independence is protected by the Constitution of Singapore, I am wondering what punishment the government will mete out to Senior Judge Chao Hick Tin, the No. 1 legal officer in Singapore.

Despite the fact that people generally believe that there is no pure form of totalitarian regime in this world due to the difficulty in controlling a large number of populations meticulously, the PAP government made it by its successful rule under the shield of the law and in the name of justice.

Abuse of psychiatry in the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) and Changi Prison

In my blog post Abuse of psychiatry in IMH and Changi Prison, I gave a detailed account of the physical and mental torture I suffered after my February protest.  

On the one hand, Dr. Cheow Enquan of IMH on Mar 14 diagnosed me with a delusional disorder of persecutory type; on the other hand, he certified that I was in sound mind. Although Dr. Cheow made his diagnosis based on his phone interview with Chao Shen Lin, my former-landlord of a Tampines flat; he deliberately ignored my report about espionage activities in the Tampines flat to Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam on Nov 17, 2018, to PM Lee on Dec 31, 2018, to Attorney-General Lucien Wong on Dec 14, 2018, Jan 7, 2019 and Feb 8, 2019.  

It is evident that the examination of the truthfulness of espionage allegations is outside the knowledge and experience of a psychiatrist. I would request Dr. Chua Hong Choon, the CEO of IMH, to justify how IMH was in a position to assess my allegations of judicial corruption, Terrex conspiracy and a series of espionage activates. The PAP government hasn’t denied my allegations so far. 

Prison psychiatrist Dr. Lim Chee Min was fully aware of Dr. Cheow’s diagnosis and the certificate, however, he had forcibly interviewed me, arbitrarily diagnosed me with a mental illness and stubbornly persuaded me to take a medication, or Olanzapine. After release, I found Olanzapine was used to treat certain mental/mood conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder. At this this moment, I still have no idea what Dr. Lim’s diagnosis was. On my release date (Aug 13), Dr. Lim even made a direction to send me to IMH for no reason.

I later found Dr. Lim Chee Min was from Changi General Hospital (CGH). I would request Dr. Lee Chien Earn, the CEO of CGH, to justify the malice on the part of Dr. Lim Chee Min in his malpractice. In my letter to PM Lee dated Nov 7, 2017, I had already complained against Dr. Ling Tiah of CGH about a forced blood draw done on Jul 17, 2017. I think it is necessary for Dr. Lee Chien Earn to look into this matter and to find out whether the idea of forced transportation was made by Supt. Faisal Mustaffa. Another prison psychiatrist who had engaged in malpractice was Dr. Rajesh Jacob.

It is evident to the world that IMH and Changi Prison are abusing psychiatry by malicious diagnosing and detaining healthy persons to cover up PAP government’s political scandals. For this reason, I will copy this email to World Psychiatric Association (WPA), who already received on email to PM Lee dated Nov 7, 2017.

I also hope the Mr. Gan Kim Yong, the Minister for Health, and Prof Chee Yam Cheng, the president of Singapore Medical Council, can pay attention to the medical malpractice in Singapore.

Prisoner abuse

In my blog post Why Changi Prison is a Slave Camp, I set out three reasons to explain why Changi Prison was a slave camp: prison officers’ questionable competence and integrity; a lack of accountability mechanism, and the unfair justice system. 

It is not possible for Changi Prison to transform inmates into law-abiding citizens because it cannot provide a morally pure environment for inmates to improve their moral fibre. Innocent inmates have to “go bad” to survive gang-controlled conditions in the prison. Justice has failed in Changi Prison so inmates have no choice but to build up alliance with other inmates.

I once asked Deputy Superintendent Louis Woo, the person in charge Housing Unit 4 of Institution B4, how to be a model prisoner. His said he didn’t know, and I believed no one knew the answer. If inmates are locked up in a cell for 23 hours a day, one inmate can do whatever another inmate can do. It is hard to imagine that some officers genuinely believed what inmates needed was mercy but not justice. They didn’t even know the principle underlying rehabilitation programs. 

The fundamental principle governing both inmates and prison officers is not virtue or honor but fear. I was deeply impressed by the standards of morality that most prison officers had, because they had to loss their sense of justice and to obey whatever order from higher management. There were a number of petty dictator officers who were dependent on their immediate senior. OC Lim Wei Kiat and RO Ahmad Naufal are petty dictators in HU2 of B4. 

The biggest dictator in B4 is Supt. Faisal Mustaffa, who had absolute power in B4. He was quite willful so always competed against me by abusing his power. He was cowardly so had maliciously taken away all my notes including drafts of my complaint letters in the hope to stop me from reporting his misconduct to the PM.

Supt. Faisal Mustaffa was cold-blooded and cruel. On May 23, 2018, I complained against his abuse of power to Commissioner Desmond Chin and requested for a transfer to Institution B2. Supt. Faisal Mustaffa calmly watched me going on hunger strikes for 3 days (from Apr 20 to 23, 2018 in PI cell 725 of HU4), 5 days (Jun 29 to Jul 4, 2018 in a PI cell in DHU) and 7 days (Aug 24 to 28 in cell 116 of HU1, Aug 28 to Aug 30, 2018 in a PC cell in DHU) for the transfer and waited for me to end my strike voluntarily. Supt. Faisal flatly rejected my request for a transfer to B2 because in his opinion, there was absolutely no abuse of power in Changi Prison.

On the afternoon of Jun 29, 2018, Supt. Faisal threw me in a PI cell of DHU to isolate me from other inmates in case they could copy me and went on a strike again. In response, I began a hunger strike. While I was supposed to be released from the PI cell after a provost officer took my statements on the morning of Jul 2, Supt. Faisal deliberately tested my willpower by ordering me to serve 3 days’ imprisonment in the same cell from the noon time of Jul 2 to Jul 4. On Jul 2, I did take the opportunity of document submission to Supreme Court and put SOS on my appeal documents. There was no response from court at all.

Supreme Court was cold-blooded as well. On Aug 27, I was taken to the Supreme Court to attend my appeal. I asked for some bread on the grounds of my hunger strike against prison officers. The appeal hearing was postponed for half an hour but I didn’t get any bread.

On Mar 18, 2019, Supt. Tan Bin Kiat of Institution B2 arbitrarily ordered me to see Dr. Lim Chee Min against my will after I told him the office certificate. On May 28, Supt. Faisal directed Chief Warder Ng Bee Teng and Chief Warder Lieow to ask me to take psychiatric medication Olanzapine because I blamed a female trainer for humiliating me.

On Jul 26, Supt. Faisal used excessive force to take me to the Supreme Court after I submitted a notice of withdrawal of my appeal to Supreme on Jul 25. The SPEAR officer even carried an assault rifle with them during the operation. On Jul 29, he even pressed a formal charge against me for refusing to attend the appeal on Jul 26. On Aug 13, Supt. Faisal ordered to forcibly transport me to IMH.

From Jul 27 to Aug 10, inmate Ang Han Boon (S064922018) in HU2 had repeatedly harassed me every day by shouting “China Dog, Go back to China”, “I will kill you on Aug 13” and “I will break your legs after I get out of the jail”. He deliberately humiliated me on the evening of Aug 9 when the national anthem was played on TV, and quite a few inmates supported him. I had to remind him to think about the image of Singapore and Changi Prison.

In response to my numerous verbal and written complaints to B4 management against inmate Ang in cell 408 and my cellmates Pravin Kumar, Steven Ng and Kelvin Chuan (L020192018) in cell 407, OC Lim Wei Kiat maliciously gave contradictory excuses in order not to take my complaints. Right before my release date, he claimed that there was not racial discrimination and harassment at all. Supt. Faisal’s strategy was to ignore all of my complaints and blamed me for not getting along with other inmates. Inmate Lee Wen Jun (L200282017) who harassed me in 2018 was even got a promotion to work as a cooki, an inmate working outside their cells as an errand boy to help prison officers reduce their workload.

In addition to widespread racial discrimination, harassment and lack of justice, there is a problem of forced drugging in prison, which was in connection with an inmate’s death at HU2 of B4 on Apr 17, 2019. It is a fact that Changi Prison categorically rejects inmates’ complaints about prison doctors and their malpractice.

It is both necessary and appropriate for me to call for the resignation of Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam and Commissioner Desmond Chin at Raffle Place.

My requests

It is clear that the PAP government has made use of Nikkei Asian Review and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s reciprocal visit to Singapore for ulterior purposes. I would request PM to reply publicly to my allegations of ulterior purposes.

I have provided sufficient evidence of the malice on the part of both IMH and Changi prison with regard to abuse of psychiatry. I think it is necessary for the PM’s office to give a call to both IMH and Changi Prison to ensure the safety of patients and inmates there. I would appreciate it if PM take my request seriously.

Due to financial difficulties, I am temporarily living in Johor Bahru of Malaysia (Jalan Perintis 1/1, Taman Nusa Perintis 79200 Nusa Jaya, Johor). I have compelling evidence to believe that the PAP government has already put me under surveillance. I would request PM to respond publicly to my allegations of the government’s espionage activities in Malaysia.

I have my way to overcome my financial difficulties. One thing is clear, I will continue my protest.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(Singapore NRIC: S7684361I)

A request for interview

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Monday, 9 September, 2019 12:49
To: Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg) <wanbao@sph.com.sg>; news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com) <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg) <shinmin@sph.com.sg>; Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg) <stforum@sph.com.sg>; Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg) <voices@mediacorp.com.sg>; Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg) <zblocal@sph.com.sg>; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk) <hkja@hkja.org.hk>; Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com) <mingpao@mingpao.com>; Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc) <news@odn.on.cc>; SCMP (letters@scmp.com) <letters@scmp.com>; Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) <localnews@singtao.com>; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk) <editor@thestandard.com.hk>; Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw) <service@taiwannews.com.tw>; United Daily News (newspro@udn.com) <newspro@udn.com>; 'Apple Daily' <news@appledaily.com.tw>; Asia times <special@atimes.com>; Jon Fasman (Economists) <jonfasman@economist.com>; Keith Bradsher (New York Times) <kebrad@nytimes.com>; 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)' <lchua@bloomberg.net>; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)' <philip@bowring.net>; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org) <dbastard@rsf.org>; Rico Hizon (BBC) <ricohizon@gmail.com>; Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse) <Roberto.Coloma@afp.com>; 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)' <aseiff@gmail.com>
Cc: AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg) <AGC@agc.gov.sg>; SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT) <SUPCOURT_QSM@supcourt.gov.sg>
Subject: A request for interview

Dear Media,

I refer to my email to PM Lee Hsien Loong dated Dec 31, 2018 about judicial corruption in Supreme Court, the Terrex conspiracy and Singapore’s Watergate scandal.

My interview request

I am writing to invite the media to interview me. I can talk more about judicial corruption, conspiracy, espionage activities, political abuse of psychiatry in the Institute of Mental Health, and cruel and inhumane rule in Changi Prison.

Although the People's Action Party (PAP) had argued that “Integrity is the Fundamentals for Singapore's Governance Success”, the PAP government is authoritarian in nature and has earned its good reputation by deception and a full control of local media. My experience with Changi Prison shows that prison officers have made no difference to inmates.

Since Aug 24, 2018, I have gone on a hunger strike against the abuse of power by Senior Sergeant Ahmed Ashraf Bin. On the afternoon of Aug 28, I was brought to Supreme Court to attend my appeal hearing. When I asked the court for some bread on the grounds of 3 days starvation, it was hard to image that the court ignored my request.

Donation

I am currently unemployed so I would give priority to the media who can donate S$10K to me. I can be interviewed in early October as I need one month or so to prepare for it. The donation money is meant to improve my living standards only. Please email your questions to me in advance, and I will reply to you in English or Chinese. For reporters who speak English only, it is better for them to have a translator with them during the interview, if any.

Please feel free to forward this email to any media, press, or organizations. The international community will see this email soon.

Clash of civilizations

Nowadays social scientists are still interested in clash of civilizations thesis and have used it to explain the growing conflicts between the US and China. It seems to me that there are two common misunderstandings of this thesis. As far as I know, no one proposed the idea of self-renewal of a civilization or explained how the self-renewal can take place. I can share my personal opinion in this regard during the interview.

Samuel Huntington, the late political scientist who proposed clash of civilization thesis in 1993, famously said that “the honesty and efficiency that Senior Minister Lee has brought to Singapore are likely to follow him to his grave”. It is me who happened to prove Huntington right.

In April this year, Kiron Skinner, the director of policy planning at the US State Department, claimed America’s rivalry with China was “a fight with a really different civilization”. A challenge to this argument is whether there are universal values to be preserved by a fight. My answer to this question is that the universal value to be preserved is just fundamental justice.

In my opinion, one common mistake about the clash of civilization thesis is to see the development of civilizations as a marathon race. Although athletes follow the same route in a marathon race, civilizations develop in the same direction but along different routes.

It is more appropriate to see the development of civilizations as a mountain climbing. All mountain climbers, or civilizations, go up from the foot of the mountain to the summit along totally different routes. As a result, climbers have to respond to different challenges posed by distinct types of mountain environments such as stone, or forest, plateau, or even volcano. It is self-evident that climbers will acquire different and sometimes unique skills during the course of their mountain climbing.

Researchers have given various answers to the Needham Question, or why had China and India been overtaken by the West in science and technology, despite their earlier successes? A popular answer given by Justin Lin in 1995 was that “the contents of civil service examinations and the criteria of promotion, which distracted the attention of intellectuals away from investing the human capital necessary for modern scientific research.”

If this answer is correct, Chinese government probably needs to push through radical political reforms to boost its scientific research. I think not. If a researcher cannot do his job well, he should blame himself but not the government as long as he has adequate research funding and access to scientific equipment. 

One simple answer to Needham Question, as given by Nathan Sivin, was that the development of science but not technology was a unique achievement of Western civilization. While other civilizations have every intention of catching up with the scientific developments initiated by the West, the question is how do that.

Maoism and Confucianism

At page 92 to 93 of Tom Plate's book Conversations with Lee Kuan Yew: How to Build a Nation, the late MM Lee Kuan Yew said that “He (Richard Nixon) asked me about Mao. So I gave him a graphic assessment of what I thought of Mao was doing. I said that Mao is painting on a mosaic with 5,000 years of history behind the mosaic. He's painting his picture on it. The rains will come. What he's said will be washed away, what's been settled for 5,000 years will remain. This is Confucius.”

It is clear to me that MM was wrong. What Mao’s said will not be washed away because it has already dramatically changed Confucianism. Under favorable circumstances, this dramatic change could make Confucianism undergo self-renewal and thus lead to the creation of a new civilization. To understand how this dramatic change works, one need to think about how Puritan ethics and ideas influenced the development of capitalism, a question answered by Max Weber in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun 

(S7684361I)

Government's possible plan for GE 2019

 Attachment: Plan for GE 2019_20190904

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Wednesday, 4 September, 2019 16:46
To: 'Yan Jun ' <medp1128@hotmail.com>
Cc: AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg) <AGC@agc.gov.sg>; Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg) <desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg>; Hong Choon Chua (hong_choon_chua@imh.com.sg) <hong_choon_chua@imh.com.sg>; K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs) (k_shanmugam@mha.gov.sg) <k_shanmugam@mha.gov.sg>; Mandarin Self Storage (hougang@mandarinselfstorage.com.sg) <hougang@mandarinselfstorage.com.sg>; QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg) <STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg>; SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT) <SUPCOURT_QSM@supcourt.gov.sg>; Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg) <wanbao@sph.com.sg>; news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com) <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg) <shinmin@sph.com.sg>; Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg) <stforum@sph.com.sg>; Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg) <voices@mediacorp.com.sg>; Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg) <zblocal@sph.com.sg>; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk) <hkja@hkja.org.hk>; Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com) <mingpao@mingpao.com>; Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc) <news@odn.on.cc>; SCMP (letters@scmp.com) <letters@scmp.com>; Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) <localnews@singtao.com>; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk) <editor@thestandard.com.hk>; Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw) <service@taiwannews.com.tw>; United Daily News (newspro@udn.com) <newspro@udn.com>; 'Apple Daily' <news@appledaily.com.tw>; 'Asia times' <special@atimes.com>; 'Jon Fasman (Economists) ' <jonfasman@economist.com>; 'Keith Bradsher (New York Times)' <kebrad@nytimes.com>; 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)' <lchua@bloomberg.net>; 'Patrick McDowell (The Wall Street Journal)' <patrick.mcdowell@dowjones.com>; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)' <philip@bowring.net>; 'Reporters Without Borders (RWB)' <asia@rsf.org>; 'Rico Hizon (BBC)' <ricohizon@gmail.com>; 'Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse)' <Roberto.Coloma@afp.com>; 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)' <aseiff@gmail.com>; Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg) <russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg>; UK Embassy (consular.singapore@fco.gov.uk) <consular.singapore@fco.gov.uk>; US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov) <singaporeusembassy@state.gov>
Subject: Government's possible plan for GE 2019

Dear Media,

 1. On Feb 28, 2019, I wrote to PM Lee Hsien Loong and the international community about my protest at Raffle Place against Singapore’s Watergate Scandal.

2. Now I am writing to inform you of one of the PAP government’s plans for the upcoming General Election (GE).  The contents of this email are part of the email I am going to send to PM Lee and the international community in a few days’ time. 

3. On Apr 17, 2019, I was sentenced to 35 weeks’ imprisonment. On Aug 13, 2019, Superintendent (Supt.) Faisal Mustaffa of Institution B4 in Changi Prison forcibly transported me to the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) for no reasons. IMH subsequently released me after a brief talk.

4. On Apr 17, I told the Prosecution and the judge that “compared to PM Lee Hsien Loong, I have plenty of time ahead. I have every intention of making the 5^th generation leader step down.” On Apr 30, the Straits Time reported that PM Lee would hand over leadership to the 4th generation leader in 2022 when he was 70 years old.

5.I believe the government’s current plan to end my continued protests is to hold a GE before Chinese president Xi Jinping’s state visit to Singapore later this year. The government has made secret preparations for the upcoming GE.

6.One predation was the announcement of PM Lee’s stepping down under the guise of an interview with Nikkei Asian Review in the context of G20 Osaka Summit. On Jun 24, PM Lee clearly stated in the interview that he would for sure pass on the baton to 4th generation leader shortly after the GE. The announcement served as a bait to lure me into going on a protest after the dissolution of parliament.

7.The other preparation was my appeal hearing scheduled for Jul 26, 2019, which unexpectedly turned into a forced appeal due to the abuse of power by Supt. Faisal Mustaffa. The Supreme Court had planned to partially allow my appeal against the sentence and to release me from the court. The purpose of the release was to show that the government was not harsh to an ordinary citizen and tolerated criticism. As a result, Singaporeans should vote for PAP in the upcoming GE. 

8.GE 2019 is expected to take place shortly after the parliament is dissolved, and I am expected to go on a protest after the GE is called. Chinese president Xi Jinping must pay a reciprocal state visit in response to President Halimah Yacob’s visit to China in May this year. President Xi’s visit is expected to showcase a good Sino-Singapore relationship.

9.My protest, along with my conviction and sentence, will be reported in the mainstream newspaper after president Xi’s state visit. The next step will be to make US president Donald Trump come to Singapore to affirm Singapore place in the world. PM Lee certainly will stay in cabinet after the GE, and I am expected to leave Singapore after serving my 6^th jail term.

10.On Jan 26, 2018, PM Lee was involved in espionage activities by announcing to Singapore media that choosing next PM will take a little bit longer to Singapore media at a ASEAN-India Commemorative Summit in New Deli. The announcement about the leadership transition was made on the basis of the information provided by Sun Jiansen, a Chinese citizen who acted as an informant for the PAP government intelligent agents.

11.It was evident to me that the government had learned from last year’s spying activities and had chosen Nikkei Asian Review but not local media for the interview. I believe that the interview was an impromptu one and the appointed time, if any, was on the afternoon of Jun 26 but not Jun 24. I need to thank Supt. Faisal Mustaffa for helping me figure out the government’s trick with regard to the leadership transition. 

12.The government’s current plan for the leadership transition is based on two assumptions. One is that I will only protest after the GE is called. And the other assumption is that I will end my protest after the GE. I am curious to find out whether the leadership transition can take place in October this year.

13.Due to some financial difficulties, I am now in Johor Bahru of Malaysia. It appears to me that the PAP government has been encouraging me to go back to support their plan. I will talk more about it in my next email. 

14.Thank you for your attention.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(Singapore NRIC: S7684361I)

Abuse of psychiatry in IMH and Changi Prison

1.     The following account is the psychiatric treatment I received in the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) and Changi prison. The psychiatrists I am complaining about are Dr. Cheow Enquan from IMH and Dr. Lim Chee Min from Changi General Hospital.

Political abuse of psychiatry

2.     On Mar 2, the Court ordered me to be remanded in IMH for two weeks for a psychiatric evaluation. While the accused persons were by default locked up in Ward 75B of IMH and allowed to watch TV during the daytime, I was directly locked up in a single cell in Ward 75A, a place for patients with serious mental illness.

3.     Nurses wouldn’t explain why I was held in solitary confinement but the other two persons stayed in Ward 75B. I requested to talk to the on-duty psychiatrist but was replied to talk to the psychiatrist in charge of my case on Monday. On the one hand, nurses and casual workers considered me as a serious problem and were extremely afraid that I would get out of the solitary confinement; on the other hand, they claimed they didn’t see me as a patient. 

4.     The following 3 interviews with Dr. Cheow Enquan of IMH proved to be a disaster. Although he didn’t appear to have any idea of my espionage allegations, Dr. Cheow simply pressed me on the espionage allegations throughout the interviews.  I had to told him to read but he to read my blogposts before his interview. The only other question he asked was whether I had completed the essay Is Singapore’s legal system fair? on my own, a question that has no connection with my mental state.

The 1st interview

5.     On Mar 4, I asked Dr. Cheow about the Prosecution’s suspicion of the mental illness I had. Given the fact that IMH had officially certified me twice to be of sound mind and diagnosed that I didn’t have a major mental illness, the Prosecution’s suspicion of a delusional disorder was ridiculous. If the suspected disorder as a major mental illness, the suspicion would refute the official diagnosis. If it was a minor mental illness, the suspicion would be baseless because the diagnosis of minor mental illness required a long-term observation. I was recently admitted on Jan 1 and Feb 23 by Dr. Kumar, and IMH released me unconditionally.

6.     Dr. Cheow answered the interview was meant to assess whether I had certain mental illness. I asked him how he designed the questions for the interview because the focus of an interview for one mental illness was significantly different from that for a mental illness with a different nature. Dr. Chew didn’t answer but pressed me to talk about my espionage allegations and the 3 charges I was facing. I told him to read my blogpost.

7.     As for my solitary confinement in Ward 75A, I told him I was considering a hunger strike for a transfer. Shortly after the interview, I was brought out to Ward 75B and shared a room with several other accused persons.

The 2nd interview

8.     On Mar 6, Dr. Cheow told me he had read my blogpost My life in Changi Prison (draft), which had little to  do with my espionage allegations. I asked Dr. Cheow whether I had Alzheimer’s diseases or other types of dementia, and he answered in negative. When questioned how he came to the conclusion without carrying out an interview, he was unable to answer. I told him that a psychiatrist was not in a position to determine whether I had a delusional disorder based on my espionage allegations because the truthfulness of these allegations was not a medical issue at all.

9.     I also reminded Dr. Cheow that the government including Attorney-General Lucien Wong was fully aware of my espionage allegations but had no intention of denying them. Instead of responding to my challenges, Dr. Cheow threatened me that he would diagnose with a major mental illness if I wouldn’t cooperate with him. I quit the interview right away.

10.  On Mar 8, I lodged a formal complaint to Dr. Chua Hong Choon, the CEO of IMH, against Dr. Cheow for his incompetence and his malice towards me. I claimed that a suspicion of certain mental illness was prerequisite for evaluating the mental state of a person, and the examination of the truthfulness of espionage allegations was outside the knowledge and experience of a psychiatrist. On Mar 9, Dr. Chau Hong Choon informed me through a staff member that I was suspected of having a delusional disorder.

The 3rd interview

11.  On Mar 11, Dr. Cheow directed me to attend his 3rd interview but I simply replied I wouldn’t. In response, he told me he had already diagnosed me with a delusional disorder. I requested to write a letter to Jennifer Jokstad, an officer in UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) in Bangkok, as I did in 2016 and 2018. Dr. Cheow approved my request so I completed the complaint letter on Mar 12 at 2pm. 

12.  In this letter, I complained that IMH forced me to attend interviews and made a diagnosis based on no information. I also requested the UNs to forward my emails to several embassies in Singapore. Shortly after I passed the letter along to the nurse, an on-duty nurse told me IMH wouldn’t email my letter to the UNs because Dr. Cheow only allowed me to write the letter so I must send the letter by email after my release. As for the delivery of my previous two letters to the UNs in 2016 and 2017 by IMH, the nurse explained that the internal policies had changed so IMH wouldn’t email my letter again.

13.  In response to Dr. Cheow’s deception, I went on a hunger strike from the dinner time until Mar 15 when I was transported back to court. At around middle night (0:30 of Mar 13), I was woken up by some noise caused by door opening. I saw 3 nurses and 4 AETOS Auxiliary police officers approaching the room. They left immediately after the nurses found I had already noticed them. Since they didn’t carry any medical equipment with them, I suspected that they planned to forcibly transfer me to Ward 75A as a result of Dr. Cheow’s diagnosis.

14.  Instantly I asked the on-duty nurse at Ward 75B why these persons came to the room, this nurse stubbornly refused to answer. In the afternoon of Mar 13, I reported this matter to the nurse clinician for an investigation but didn’t get a reply. IMH even confiscated my letter wrote to the UNs on Mar 13 and gave me a photocopy of it when I was left on Mar 15.

Political abuse of psychiatry in IMH

15.  I didn’t get a copy of the Dr. Cheow Enquan’s official report submitted to the court until late March in prison. In his report, Dr. Cheow claimed at paragraph 2 that “The nature and purpose of the forensic psychiatric evaluation was explained to the accused at the commencement of the first interview on 4 March including an emphasis on the lack/absence of confidentiality in the interaction”. Dr. Cheow made a false allegation here as he had never explained to me about the nature and purpose of the evaluation. In fact, he was even unable to justify the Prosecution’s suspicion of the delusion disorder in the first place.

16.  I had already reported the espionage activities to the government in the Tampines flat to Minister of Home Affairs on Nov 17, 2018, to PM Lee on Dec 31, 2018, to Attorney- General on Dec 14, 2018, Jan 7, 2019 and Feb 8, 2019, however, I haven’t received a reply from the government about its position on my espionage allegations. Moreover, Dr. Cheow didn’t even tell me his interview with a third-party including Chao Shen Lin.

17.  In fact, Dr. Cheow deliberately withheld from me his phone interviews with my ex-spouse Liu Tian and my ex-landlord Chao Shen Lin of the Tampines flat, both of whom had a conflict of interests with me. Dr. Cheow made his diagnosis exclusively based on Chao’s statements, he didn’t subject Chao to a cross-examination to establish Chao’s credibility. In addition, Dr. Cheow completely ignored the substantial evidence set out in my blogpost that linked Chao to government’s intelligence agencies.

18.  The evidence was provided in my email to PM Lee Hisen Loong on Dec 31, 2019, to AG Lucien Wong on Jan 7, 2019 and Feb 8, 2019. In addition, I informed the spying activities by Chao’s colleagues to Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam on Nov 17, 2018 and to AG Lucien Wong on Dec 14, 2018. In addition, I made police report (G_20181214_7029)  on Dec 14, 2018, report (G/20181210/2076) on Dec 10, 2018 and lodged a magistrate complaint MJ 005 on Dec 13, 2019 about the spying activities in the Chao’s flat. 

Abuse of psychiatry in Institution B2

19.  On Mar 15, I was transferred to Changi Prison. On Mar 16, I talked to Supt. Tan Bian Kiat, the person-in-charge of Institution B2. Supt Tan was surprised how I could memorize the number of cells I stayed a few year ago after reading my blogpost My life in Changi Prison (draft). He tested me by asking me the number of the cell I was lock up but I couldn’t give an answer. I didn’t pay attention to the number of cells for a temporary stay. To avoid misunderstanding, I deliberately told him the IMH’s certificate.

20.  On the morning of Mar 18, a prison officer handcuffed me and forced me to see prison psychiatrist Dr. Lim Chee Min. I told Dr. Lim about the certificate issued by IMH on Mar 14, 2019 and asked him for the legal basis of the interview. Dr. Lim simply answered he voluntarily interviewed me to ensure my safety. While Dr. Lim was still asking me questions about my mood and hearing voices, I told him I wouldn’t give him my consent for the interview. I stopped talking to him but Dr. Lim pressed ahead with his questions. To my surprise, Dr. Lim finally managed to diagnose me with certain mental illness.

21.  Dr. Lim not only prescribed a medication for me but strongly persuaded me to take it. He told me neither his diagnosis nor the effect and side effect of his medication. The interview finished in about 5minutes. Since the afternoon of March 18, the nurses in B2 had asked me to take medication every day until Apr 18 when I was transferred to B4. On April 3, B2 officer forced to see Dr. Lim, who explained “I know you are a reasonable person, but you’d better take the medication I prescribed”.

22.  After released from Changi Prison, I found the medication was Olanzapine, which is used to treat certain mental/mood conditions (such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). It may also be used in combination with other medication to treat depression. This medication can help to decrease hallucinations and help you to think more clearly and positively about yourself, feel less agitated, and take a more active part in everyday life.

23.  I later asked Supt. Tan for the legal basis for the involuntary interview and drugging, he simply answered I could choose not to take the medication. Supt. Tan firmly rejected my request to make a formal complaint to Commissioner Desmond Chin against him and Dr. Lim Chee Min about the forced interview and drugging.

Abuse of psychiatry in Institution B4

24.  The situation didn’t change much after I was transferred to HU1 of B4 on April 18. Unlike officers in B2, B4 officers also kept asking me to take the medication against my will. In response to my complaint, HU1 management on the morning April 22 directed me talk to a prison physician, who claimed that Changi Prison was the guardian of prisoners so a prison officer had authority to order any prisoner to see a prison doctor against prisoner’s will. In the afternoon, I complained to my Personal Supervisor (PS) Chief Warder Lee Li Tsung about the force drugging. Despite my strong objection to psychiatric interviews, Chief Lee still suggested that I talked to the psychiatrist again in the hope to discontinue the medication. 

25.  On the morning of Mar 23, I was ordered to talk to Dr. Lim Chee Min again. I declined to take to him but he still insisted that I must take his medication. In response to my complaint, Operation Commander (OC) Calvin Tan, the person in charge of HU1, replied that I could temporarily stop the medication but must take it when I needed it.  Since I was even aware of Dr. Lim’s diagnosis and the purpose of the medication, I concluded that I was not in a position to take the medication and had a need for it. OC Calvin Tan didn’t answer. Later in the morning, Supt. Faisal talked to me and approved my request not to take medications.

26.  On May 10, Supt. Faisal finally approved my request for a transfer from HU1 to HU4 in response to my hunger strike. On the same day, I told RO Looi Wei about Supt. Faisal’s decision so HU4 officers agreed not to ask me to take the medication. On May 27, I was ordered to take a course A-ECM conducted by a female Malay trainer in her 50’s from Singapore Corporation of Rehabilitative Enterprises (SCORE). This trainer intentionally humiliated me by asking me why “China girls spoke aloud so people didn’t like them”.

27.  She concluded Chinese had a habit of speaking loudly because China was a big country and people there had to speak loudly from one mountain to another. In addition, she used her working experience as a nurse and a hotel staff member to discriminate against Malaysian, Pilipino, Indian and Bruneian. I did my best not to lose my temper during the course but was unable to accept her humiliation. In my opinion, she made no difference from a housewife and her acted as a trainer in prison because the competitive job market outside the prison.

28.  On May 28, I requested to OC Louis Woo for a piece of paper to lodge a formal complaint against the trainer but got no response. On the morning of May 29 at 8am, I submitted to Supt. Faisal a short note about the trainer’s discrimination via RO Looi Wei Hao. To make B4 management take my complaint seriously, I put it in the note that I was considering humiliating PM Lee Hsien Loong in front of the international community.

29.  In sharp contrast to my expectation Supt. Faisal could investigate my complaint, a cooki deliberately asked me to come down to take medication at 4PM (PM medication time). I was very surprised at the request because this didn’t happen in HU4 previously. When I came down and asked who made this decision, both cooki and nurse kept silent. Chief Warder Ng Bee Teng didn’t answer my question but immediately directed me ot get back to the cell if I wouldn’t take the medication.

30.  Since B4 management deliberately persuade me to take the medication, I went on a hunger strike from the morning of May 20 in response. In the afternoon, Chief Ng Bee Teng talked told me it was the nurse who decided that I should take medication. It was clear to me that she made a false allegation because the nurse had no authority to make a cooki follow his direction. The decision must be made be Supt. Faisal because it was him who approved my request not to take the medication. 

31.  In late June, RO Looi Wei Hao told me all psychiatric interviews were scheduled by medical team but not prison officers. I told him I wouldn’t talk to any psychiatrist during my jail term and he agreed. While I had gone on hunger strikes for 5 times after I was transferred to B4 on Apr 18, I didn’t stage any hunger strike in B4 in the past two years. Nor did I submit a formal complaint letter against an inmate in B2. On the morning of Jul 22, I made a formal complaint to Supt. Faisal about malice that HU management had towards me. In the letter, I requested him to hold an inter-institute discussion with B2 officers about inmate management. I also attached a letter to Supt. Tan Bin Kiat for his order to direct Chief Daniel to take part in this discussion.

32.  In the afternoon at about 3:30pm, RO Looi Wei Hao suddenly came to the cell to check whether I was willing to talk to psychiatrists from IMH. He claimed the psychiatrists voluntarily came prison to talk to me and the prison didn’t get involve in this matter. I declined to talk to IMH psychiatrists. On the afternoon of Jul 22, Supt. Faisal suddenly talked to me about my complaint and strongly persuade me to try to stay in HU2 for a while. This decision showed clearly that Supt. Faisal attempted to transfer me to a HU for “well behaved” prisoners (most of them were drug users) to avoid the inter-institution discussion.

My suffering in HU2 caused by OC Lim Wei Kiat

33.  On the evening of Jul 22, I was transferred from 811 of HU4 to 407 of HU2. Although I applied to get back to HU4 on Jul 23, Supt. Supt. Faisal completely disregard my request and my hunger strike for the transfer. As a result, I stayed in that cell until I was forcibly transported to IMH on my release date Aug 13.

34.  I was really impressed by the anarchism, brutality and inhumanity caused by the gross competence on the part of Deputy Superintendent (DSP) Lim Wei Kiat. Unlike prison officers in B2 or HU1 or HU4 of B4, prison officers in HU2 didn’t do justice in any way. Unlike officers in B2, HU1 or HU4 of B4, HU2 officers wouldn’t handle prisoners’ complaints and disregard prisoners’ hunger strikes altogether.

35.  On Aug 8, I was ordered to see Dr. Lee Chee Min and he insisted I must see a psychiatrist from IMH on my release date. I asked for his host hospital to complain about him but he simply answers I could talk to prison officers. I have already lodged a complaint against him to DSP Loius Woo when I was in HU4 but DSP Loius Woo declined to accept my complaint and even withhold Dr. Lim’s name from me.

36.  On Aug 9, I wrote to B4 management to ensure not to talk to the IMH psychiatrist on Aug 13. On the morning of Aug 10, I submitted an urgent letter through prison guard to Chia Jin Ming Benjamin, commander of Cluster B, and Commissioner Desmond Chin. In this letter, I requested the Chnagi Prison to ensure my safety on my release date. On the afternoon, DSP Lim Wei Kiat talked to me about the interview. I told him that on Oct 28, 2016, the release date of my 1st imprisonment, I was forcibly transportation of me to IMH by B2 officers happened.

37.   

38.  While the B2 officers claimed that prison psychiatrist Rajesh Jacob didn’t diagnosed me with any mental illness and the forced transportation was meant to check my mental state by a IMH psychiatrist, IMH psychiatrist Jaydip Sarkar stated in his official report that Rajesh Jacob not only diagnosed me with delusional disorder but also prescribed antipsychotic medications. What DSP Lim interested was what happened to me after I was sent to IMH. I told him I was hospitalized first but IMH released me two weeks later in response to my hunger strike.

Forced transportation to IMH

39.  On the morning of Aug 13, the other inmate in the cell whose was to be released on the same day was released at 8am. I was detained in the cell and was told to wait for further notice. The only explanation was that the prison was about to send me to IMH. At about 10am, RO Ahmad Naufal told me to be released and claimed he was not kidding me. In response to my request to talk to Supt. Faisal about my complaint about the misconduct on the part fo B4 management, he simply answered I needed to talk to the on-duty officer at the counter of Institutional Communication Center (ICC). 

40.  When I was led to ICC, Guoh Tjin Soon, Staff Officer of Sentence Management Branch of B2, was there waiting for me to pass to me my stuff confiscated by police on Feb 28, 2019. When I asked on-duty officer Supt. Koo Boon Wah about the interview with the psychiatrist from IMH, he answered I would be sent to IMH and emphasized IMH may not hospitalize me.

41.  I wouldn’t voluntarily to sit in the wheelchair and blamed RO Ahmad Naufal for cheating me but he didn’t reply. I told Supt. Koo Boon Wah to use force on me and I wouldn’t’ resist in any way. Officer Kenneth Koh, who claimed he was the newly appointed 2nd superintendent of B4, told me he surely would forcibly transport me to IMH. I told him I was the only person in Singapore who was able to make PM Lee Hsien Loong step down and then memorized his name tag. Supt Koh walked into a room and didn’t come back. 

42.  When I sat on the chair next to the counter, Supt Koo Boon Wah said he would use reasonable force to put me in the wheelchair. In contrast to my imagination that two officers would hold me from left and right side and put me in the chair gently, three prison officer including Sergeant Ahmed Ashraf Bin Ismail from HU1 carried out the operation. The other two officers were from HU2. I didn’t see their name tags so Kenneth Koh must have told them to remove them from their uniforms. I didn’t resist in any way, however, Sergeant Ahmed Ashraf Bin Ismail deliberately folded my left wrist inwardly and that hart me. After putting me in the wheelchair, they tied both my arms and legs to the wheelchair and even put a mask on my face.

43.  At about 11:30, I was transported to IMH. The on-duty nurse John applied four-point restrain to tied up both my arms and legs to a bed in the emergency room. In the following hour and half, I was not allowed to go to toilet because nurses wouldn’t remove the restraints. When question the reason for the use of four-point restraints on me, nurse John insisted the restrains were necessary because prison officers used restraint on me and the use of restraint was for my own benefit. When questioned about the correctness of prison officer’s decision, nurse John told me to talk to doctors. At about 1pm, I finally talked to Dr. Ng Wei Lik Jared.

44.  To my surprise, Dr. Ng asked why I was sent to IMH because Dr. Lee Chee Min didn’t state the reason in his referral letter. I answered I was forcibly transported to IMH. Dr. ordered the nurse to remove the restraint and talked to me in an interview room in presence of Senior Case Manager Jasmine Soh and Senior Social Worker Keely Koh. Changi Prison also referred my case to social workers even though I was not a patient at all.

45.  First of all, Dr. Ng made it clear that I was of sound mind so no psychiatrist could conduct any interview on me without getting my informed consent. Secondly, he appeared to be particular interested in my personal matters such as my job search and whether I would continue to stay in the Yishun flat (Yishun Ave 9, BLK 249, #06-193, S’ 760249). I reminded him those questions were not medical questions. He also explained that Ms. Jasmine Soh would be happy to help me get a room if I need any help.

46.  When questioned about the inconsistency in three reports provided by IMH on my mental state, Dr. Ng explained that delusional disorder could fluctuate, so a psychiatrist must conduct a fresh psychiatric evaluation if the previous diagnoses contradicted each other. It was clear to me that a psychiatrist was not in a position to make an accurate diagnosis at all with a delusional disorder.

Conclusion

47.  According to Wikipedia, political abuse of psychiatry is the misuse of psychiatry, including diagnosis, detention, and treatment, for the purposes of obstructing the human rights of individuals and/or groups in a society. The misconduct on the part of IMH and Changi Prison certain is meant to cover up PAP government’s political scandals by maliciously diagnosing me with a delusional disorder of prosecution type.