Complaint letter to Minister K Shanmugam on Apr 26, 2020

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:09 PM
To: K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs)
Cc: Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg); US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov); AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); CHIA Jin Ming Benjamin (SPS, B cluster); Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg); Eng Chye Tan (uprsec@nus.edu.sg); FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (SPS, B4); Hong Choon Chua (IMH); HOONG Wee Teck (SPF); Jean Paul THIERY (bchtjp@nus.edu.sg); K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs); LEE Chien Earn (CGH); LOH Hong Wai (SPS, B5); Middle East Institute (contact.mei@nus.edu.sg); Nigel Tan Choon Kiat (NTU); PM Office (pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg); QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg); Rajesh Jacob (Prison Psychiatrist); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; Subra SURESH (NTU); SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); Tan Bin Kiat (SPS, B2); TAN Chun-Yuan Avryl (SPS, B3); WEE Lian-Chyuan Wilfred (SPS, B1); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'
Subject: Request to look in the Government's espionage activities

Dear Minister

I refer to my email to the Minister on Apr 6, 2020 with regard to 3 matters. I haven’t received any reply from the Minister.

The 1^st matter

The 1^st matter was my complaint against a national security officer Xiu Chao in police report G/20200406/7065. The case was assigned to police officer Wang Junjie, and I had emailed Officer Wang twice and called him once. So far I haven’t received any response from him. It was clearly stated in the police report that Xiu Chao’s mobile number was 92463166.

I don’t understand why the police has responded to my report because the case is extremely simple. I copy this email to Officer Wang Junjie in the hope that I can get back my luggage as soon as possible with his assistance. Xiu Chao’s mobile number was 92463166.

The 2^nd matter

The 2^nd matter was about my appeal to the ICA for a fee waiver for a replacement IC. Officer I was told to wait for a reply in due course. Since my passport was detained by the State Courts, I don’t own a valid identity document to use for the time being. I am wondering whether ICA can issued any temporary identity document to me.

The 3^rd matter (Princess international Express)

The 3^rd matter was my suspicion about the PAP government’s involvement in an espionage activity in Princess International Express, a transportation company in Shen Zhen of China. On Apr 10, I paid the shipping cost of RMB 125 and left the delivery address (BLK 419, #11-192, Bedok North Street 1, Singapore 460419) to the Princess.

On Apr 13 at 16:15, the Princess explained that the parcel was still in the store room because they were still waiting for my final decision about the delivery. I clearly answered not to ship out the parcel and even gave them a return address for my 3^rd order to Hu Nan province.

On Apr 15, the Princess asked me about the return address for my 1^st order. On Apr 16, I replied to leave the 1^st order in their company because I was going to lodge a complaint about them to their supervisors. The Princess didn’t answer my question about the return shipment of my 3^rd order to Hu Nan province.

On Apr 24, I suddenly received a call from a deliveryman of Ninja Van Shipping Company and learned I had a parcel to be delivered to a Bedok Reservoir flat (BLK142, #07-1553, Bedok Reservoir Road Singapore 470142). I checked with the Princess and was told that the Bedok Reservoir address was the address that I mostly used. On Apr 25, the Princess further explained that my parcel had already been packed up so they simply shipped it to me without informing me.

I certainly don’t accept this explanation because I used the Bedok Reservoir address only once in November last year. It was out of sheer malice that the Princess Express disregarded my instructions and delivered my parcel to a wrong address, without even informing me. I believe the Princess Express was scared of a careful inspection from the authorities. 

My conspiracy claim about the circuit breaker period

In my letter to PM Lee Hsien Loong on Apr 23, 2020, I blamed the PM for deliberately plying up the COVID-19 pandemic situation to cover up the government’s misconduct. I still sand by my words. The government’s worry was my moving out from the Bedok North unit on Apr 23. I could choose to move out to another flat or to Changi Prison. If I had complained to PM Lee and the international community about the government’s misconduct and had withdrawn my appeal, I would have gone back to prison in the next few days. Since there was no need to extend the circuit breaker period if I chose to stay in prison, the government was eager to know my decision about the where to move on Apr 23.

Now tenant B and C suddenly left out the room on the morning of Apr 26, 2020 after I found the evidence that they were spying on me through a hidden camera yesterday. The so-called own came and asked me to leave the room immediately. 

I believe this is also espionage activity conducted by the government. The police officer handling this case are Ryan Lin T. H and Alfred Khung.

Please look in to this matter.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I)

My 14th letter to PM Lee Hsien Loong about the circuit breaker period

 Attachment: Why is the circuit breaker period a conspiracy

police report_G_20200421_7034

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:41 AM
To: Lee Hsien Loong (PM)
Cc: Chief Executive's Office_HK (ceo@ceo.gov.hk); HK Customs and Excise Department (customsenquiry@customs.gov.hk); AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); CHIA Jin Ming Benjamin (SPS, B cluster); Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg); Eng Chye Tan (uprsec@nus.edu.sg); FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (SPS, B4); Hong Choon Chua (IMH); HOONG Wee Teck; ICA IC Unit (ICA); Jean Paul THIERY (bchtjp@nus.edu.sg); K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs); LEE Chien Earn (CGH); LOH Hong Wai (SPS, B5); Middle East Institute (contact.mei@nus.edu.sg); Nigel Tan Choon Kiat (NTU); PM Office (pmo_hq@pmo.gov.sg); QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg); Rajesh Jacob (Prison Psychiatrist); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); Tan Bin Kiat (SPS, B1); TAN Chun-Yuan Avryl (SPS, B3); WEE Lian-Chyuan Wilfred (SPS, B1); Alejandro Ponce (The World Justice Project); Sofie Arjon Schutte (U4 Anti-corruption resource centre); Yuri Fedotov (United Nations Office on Drug and Crime); Buscaglia Edgardo (Columbia University); Garry Rodan (Murdoch University); Matthew Stephenson (mstephen@law.harvard.edu); S.T. Quah Jon (National University of Singapore); Silverstein Gordon (Yale University) ; Susan Rose Ackerman (Yale University); 'Freedom House'; info@article19.org; mail@globalwitness.org; 'Mickey Spiegel (Human Right Watch)'; 'Phil Robertson (Human Right Watch)'; Yu Hah Ming (mingyu.hah@amnesty.org); Gail Davidson (Lawyers Rights Watch Canada); International Association of Judges; Talia Dove (International Bar Association); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'; Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (cfaenquiries@hkcfa.hk); Supreme Court of Canada (reception@scc-csc.ca); Supreme Court of India (supremecourt@nic.in); Supreme Court of New Zealand (supremecourt@justice.govt.nz); Supreme Court of South Africa (PaMyburgh@justice.gov.za); The Privy Council (enquiries@supremecourt.uk); Indonesia Embassy (singapura.kbri@kemlu.go.id); Myanmar Embassy (ambassador@myanmarembassy.sg); Philippines Embassy (philippine.embassy.singapore@gmail.com); Thailand Embassy (thaisgp@singnet.com.sg); Vietnam Embassy (vnemb.sg@mofa.gov.vn); Argentina Embassy (consulares_eisia@mrecic.gov.ar); Brazil Embassy (brasemb.cingapura@itamaraty.gov.br); Russia Embassy (russian_embassy@singnet.com.sg); Saudi Arabia Embassy (sgemb@mofa.gov.sa); South Africa Embassy (singapore.consular@dirco.gov.za); South Korea Embassy (korembsg@mofa.go.kr); Turkey Embassy (embassy.singapore@mfa.gov.tr); Australia Embassy (info.ausg@vfshelpline.com); Canada Embassy (spore@international.gc.ca); German Embassy (info@singapur.diplo.de); Italy Embassy (ambasciata.singapore@esteri.it); Japan Embassy (infoculture@sn.mofa.go.jp); US Embassy (singaporeusembassy@state.gov)
Subject: Is the circuit breaker period a conspiracy?

Dear PM Lee Hsien Loong,

I am writing to question the PM about a conspiracy in which the PM has personally involved. 

My conspiracy claim

The conspiracy refer to the government’s plan to play up the COVID-19 pandemic situation with the so-called circuit breaker period to minimize the detrimental effects arising from the government’s misconduct including Changi Prison’s authoritarian rule.

In other words, the circuit breaker period was proposed to counter my exposure of Changi Prison’s inhuman rule in my email to the PM and the international community. The extension of the circuit breaker period is to cover the date when I write to the PM so the government’s misconduct can be minimized by the exaggerated pandemic situation.   

On Apr 21, 2020 at 5pm, the PM announced the extension of the circuit breaker period for 4 weeks from May 4 to Jun 1. The information that I was not going to write to the PM before May 4, was provided by a male tenant who has been manipulated as a government informant to conduct surveillance on me with other tenants in a Bedok North unit (BLK 419, #11-192, Bedok North Street 1, Singapore 460419) since Mar 23, 2020 when I moved in.

I have made a police report (G/20200421/7034) against this tenant and have included his picture in the report. In the attached file, I have provided the supporting evidence and a thorough analysis to prove that the PM’s sudden announcement on Apr 21 was made on the basis of the information obtained by espionage activities. The PM’s announcement made on Apr 18 was a covert act, an essential element in an offence of criminal conspiracy.

In my letter to the PM on Dec 31, 2018, I gave a detailed account of Singapore’s Watergate scandal, or another conspiracy organized by the PAP government. I claimed that SUN Jianseng, a Chinese citizen and a cotenant in the flat (Tampines Street 11, BLK 134. #02-204 Singapore 521134) with me at the time, had been used by the PAP government as informant to unlawfully seek the information as to whether I would go to Hong Kong to continue my protest. 

Misconduct on the part of Changi Prison

On Mar 21, 2020, I complained to the State Courts about a cover-up by Changi Prison in cooperation with the Supreme Court, the State Courts and some medical professionals. The results of my recent blood and urine tests have come out, and I think further examinations on my kidney, and heart and brain are required. I will talk about Singapore’s healthcare system later on.

However, the purpose of this letter is not to request to government to settle the abuse of medicine and inhuman treatment in the prison system because I always give priority to serious issues involving the head of government.

The purpose of this letter

It is evident that the object of the government’s conspiracies is to win the upcoming General Election (GE). It is a very serious matter for a government to stay in power by manipulating a pandemic situation, with a complete disregard for human life.

As the only person who is in the position to expose the PAP’s conspiracy, I would request the PM to publicly respond to my claim of conspiracy before the GE. In other words, I would request the PM to give a straight answer to the world with yes or no about whether the PAP government is going to hold a GE during the coronavirus outbreak.

I certainly will complain to the PM and the world about other problems that the government is facing if the government is not going to manipulate the coronavirus situation. 

Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I)

PS: Between 0:00 to 0:20 this morning, 3 tenants who shared the room with me illegally copied data from my laptop without getting my permission. I am absolutely certain about my espionage claim against them. I still prefer to stay in the Bedok North Unit and request the Bedok Police Division to look into the spying activities in this room.   

Dear YAN JUN

POLICE REPORT

I refer to your Police report lodged on 21/04/2020.

Your report has been forwarded to the following police unit for follow-up:

  Police Unit : Bedok Police Divisional Investigation Branch

  Investigation Officer In-charge : MUHAMMAD HARIZ SIM JIA JUN BIN MUHAMMAD HAFIZ SIM

  Contact Number : 62447200

  Email : Hariz_JJ_SIM@spf.gov.sg

An official copy of your report is attached below.  Please quote this report no. G/20200421/7034 for future reference.  You may wish to print a copy of the report for your retention.

Yours faithfully

Muhd Hariz Sim Jia Jun Bin Muhammad Hafiz Sim Electronic Police Centre Singapore Police Force (This is an auto-generated email. Please do not reply to this email.)

My email to the State Courts on Mar 23, 2020 about my mailing address

 From: Yan Jun 

Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 11:45 AM
To: QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg)
Cc: AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'
Subject: Address

Dear the State Courts,

Personal Bond: 2020-0318-901474

1.      I refer to the above-mentioned personal bond. My current address is BLK 419, #11-192, Bedok North Street 1, Singapore 460419.

2.      After I was arrested on Nov 20, 2019, police officers at Central Police Division instructed me to take all my stuff out of my backpack, but I left a hard dick inside. While Police confiscated my backpack later on, I did ask police to return the hard dick to me on the same day. The female investigating officer in charge of my case was fully aware of this matter. On Dec 17, 2019, I also requested a judge to direct the DPP to return the hard disk to me.  

3.      Now my hard disk is still detained by the police. I would request the Court to order the Prosecution to return my hard disk or to provide me with the legal basis why it must be detained by the police.    

4.      Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I, S08832020)

Letter to Prison Commissioner Desmond Chin on Mar 24, 2020 about the medical report

 From: Yan Jun 

Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 8:11 PM
To: Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg)
Cc: K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs); AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); QSM_STATE (STATECOURTS) (STATECOURTS_QSM@StateCourts.gov.sg); SUPCOURT QSM (SUPCOURT); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'; CHEAM Tiong Pheng (cheam_tiong_pheng@pris.gov.sg); CHEW Chwee Leong Vincent (SPS); CHIA Jin Ming Benjamin (benjamin_chia@pris.gov.sg); CHUA Cheng Wah (chua_cheng_wah@pris.gov.sg); DAVE Singh Calais; Desmond Chin (SPS) (desmond_chin@pris.gov.sg); FAISAL Bin Mustaffa (faisal_mustaffa@pris.gov.sg); GOH Song Huat Edwin (edwin_goh@pris.gov.sg); KARAM Singh (SPS); KOO Boon Wah (SPS); LAM Mong Teng (lam_mong_teng@pris.gov.sg); LEO Hee Sun Timothy (SPS); LIM Ai Lian Caroline (caroline_lim@pris.gov.sg); LIM Bee Bee (lim_bee_bee@pris.gov.sg); Lim Wei Kiat (SPS); LOH Hong Wai; Looi Wei Hao (SPS); MOHAMED FAHMY Bin Mohamed Hanifah (mohamed_fahmy_mohamed_hanifah@pris.gov.sg); NG Chun Chow Patrick (patrick_ng@pris.gov.sg); ONG Choon Teck (ong_choon_teck@pris.gov.sg); SHIE Yong Lee (shie_yong_lee@pris.gov.sg); SIAH Kheng Guan (siah_kheng_guan@pris.gov.sg); SOH Yen Li (soh_yen_li@pris.gov.sg); Sze Chuck Huang (SPS) (sze_chuck_huang@pris.gov.sg); Tan Bin Kiat (SPS) (tan_bin_kiat@pris.gov.sg); TAN Chun-Yuan Avryl (SPS); TAN Yeow Chong Simon (simon_tan@pris.gov.sg); Teo Hock Soon (SPS) (teo_hock_soon@pris.gov.sg); Timothy CHOO Wei Liang (timothy_choo@pris.gov.sg); WEE Lian-Chyuan Wilfred (wilfred_wee@pris.gov.sg)
Subject: Request for medical reports

Dear Commissioner Desmond Chin,

1.      I refer to my email dated Mar 21, 2020 to the State Courts about the cover-up by Changi Prison. I haven’t received any reply from the State Courts in response to this email.

2.      However, on Mar 24, 2020, the Stare Courts did reply to me with regard to my letter dated Mar 5, 2020 from the prison. The reply is absolutely unnecessary for me because District Judge Eddy Tham had already dealt with this letter, or my request for a bail pending appeal, during a hearing on Mar 18.

My requests

3.      I am writing to the Commissioner for original reports made by A&E doctors in Changi General Hospital (CGH) on Dec 20, 2019 and by Dr. Dr. Tan Nigel Choon Kiat on Mar 16, 2020 about their diagnosis of my medical conditions. I need these reports for further medical examinations and treatment.

4.      I ought to pay at least $110 for these medical reports, so I prefer to get the reports from the prison directly. It is a fact that CGH issued these reports to me, not to Changi Prison. I have no objection if the prison keeps a copy of these reports. If Changi Prison declines to issue these medical reports to me, please let me know the legal basis of this decision.  

5.      In addition, I am asking for the following medical treatment:

(i) the order made by a prison physician on Dec 5, 2019 to keep me under compulsory psychiatric observation;

(ii) the order made by prison psychiatrist Rajesh Jacob on Dec 9 to release me from the observation and the psychiatric prescription he gave to me on the same day;

(iii) the prison physician’s decision made on Jan 10, 2020 at HU2 of B2 in response to my report of sick;

(iv) the prison physician’s decision made at HU1 of B2 on Feb 25 about the CT scan of the brain in response to my report of sick;

(v) the prison physician’s decision made on Mar 3, 9 at HU1 of B1 in response to my report of sick.

6.      My request for these report is a very serious matter. For that reason, I copy this email to various organizations and will forward it to PMO soon.

7.      Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I, S08832020)

Letter to Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam dated Apr 6, 2020

Attachment: Police Report 20200406/7065

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 6:32 PM
To: K Shanmugam (Minister for Home Affairs)
Cc: SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg) ; AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); ICA IC Unit (ICA); Lian He Wan Bao (wanbao@sph.com.sg); news@theindependent.sg; Online Citizen (Singapore) (theonlinecitizen@gmail.com); Shin Min Daily (shinmin@sph.com.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Today (voices@mediacorp.com.sg); Zao Bao (zblocal@sph.com.sg); editor.sh@sinarharian.com.my; editor@malaysiakini.com; editorial@sinchew.com.my; estherng@thestar.com.my; newscentre@chinapress.com.my; Hong Kong Journalists Association (hkja@hkja.org.hk); Ming Pao (mingpao@mingpao.com); Oriental Daily News (news@odn.on.cc); SCMP (letters@scmp.com); Singtao Daily (localnews@singtao.com) ; The Standard (editor@thestandard.com.hk); Taiwan news (service@taiwannews.com.tw); United Daily News (newspro@udn.com); 'Apple Daily'; Asia times; Jon Fasman (Economists) ; Keith Bradsher (New York Times); 'Linus Chua (Bloomberg)'; 'Philip Bowring (The South China Morning Post)'; Reporters Without Borders (dbastard@rsf.org); Rico Hizon (BBC); Roberto Coloma (Agence France-Presse); 'Seiff Abby (Freelance Corrrespondent)'
Subject: Complaint about 3 matters

Dear Minister K Shamugan,

I am writing to the Minster for Home Affairs to complain about three matters.

The 1^st issue: Complaint about Xiu Chao (National security officer)

In my email dated Nov 20, 2019 to PM Lee Hsien Loong, I claimed that the Bedok flat I stayed (BLK142, #07-1553, Bedok Reservoir Road Singapore 470142) was a trap set by the government. Xiu Chao, who claimed to be the owner of the flat, insisted that I must move out on Nov 21 because the flat was going to be sold on Nov 22, 2019 (See the screenshot 1, 2 and 3 of WhatsApp messages on Oct 30, 2019 at 22:09 - 22:10). 

I later found that PM Lee was scheduled to visit Korea on Nov 22.

Xiu has unlawfully detained my luggage since Mar 18, 2020 and wouldn’t answer my question about the legal basis for his action. He insisted that I must take back my luggage at a time that he preferred. The location to pick up my luggage was the void deck of the BLK 142, as if my luggage was still in the Bedok flat. On Apr 5, he wouldn’t give me a chance to check my luggage but forced me to accept it. I have lodged a police report (G/20200406/7065).

The 2^nd issue: the replacement IC

My NRIC was stolen on Feb 9, 2019 in the Hougang flat (BLK 540, #02-1221, Hougang Ave 8, Singapore 530540). On Feb 12, 2019, I made a police report (G/20190212/7013) online, and Tan Sze Herng in Hougang NPC was assigned to the officer in charge of this case. So far, I haven’t received any reply from him.

On Mar 19, 2020, I applied to the ICA for a replacement IC and a waiver of the replacement fee on the grounds that I am the victim of a theft case. The ICA replied that they would inform me the outcome of my application in due course.

The 3^rd issue: a possible espionage of the PAP government in China

In my email dated Nov 20, 2019 to PM Lee, I also mentioned an espionage by Malaysian citizen Yap Foo Beng. Yap was caught to secretly collect and open my parcel without my knowledge. The contents of the parcel, a backpack and a printer cartridge, were ordered on Taobao and was shipped to Johor Bahru using GD Express, an international transportation company, by Princess International Express from ShenZhen city of China. When Yap returned the parcels to me, I found the parcel containing the cartridge was already opened. 

On Mar 27, I ordered two items, a backpack and a pair of glasses, on Taobao and gave two selling companies the same address of Princess International Express, or address A (No. 258, Xintian Avenue, Fuhai Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guang Dong Province, 518128). The backpack with the tracking number YT4423631303845 was delivered on Mar 29 and was accepted.

When the shipping company (Zhong Tong) delivered the spectacles with the tracking number 74338519375286 to the same address on the afternoon of Mar 30 at 17:55, the Princess Express suddenly directed the mailman to deliver it to address B without my knowledge. In the evening, I found the reversion of my parcel by checking the online tracking system.  

On the morning of Mar 31, I informed the seller that I didn’t change the address and insisted on shipping the parcel to the original address. The shipping company (Zhong Tong Kuai Di) expressly stated that it was the customer who requested for a change of address to address B (Lian He Wu Jin, Sha Jing Street, He’er 2^nd Rd, Shenzhen City, Guang Dong Province). Although Princess Express already received the parcel on April 1, they changed the address again so the online system showed that the parcel was delivered on April 2.

The Princess Express was unable to justify why they wouldn’t accept the parcel on the afternoon of Mar 30 when it was delivered to address A. Their explanation was that the mailman was unable to correctly deliver the parcel to address A so they directed him to send it to address B, another store of Princess Express. 

Now my parcels are still in Princess Express. Surprisingly, now the online official tracking information for the two parcels have been erased. A mistake made by a receiving company is not supposed to affect the official tracking information provided by a shipping company. 

Like Yap Foo Beng, the staff members of the Princess Express could open and examine the parcel outside their company for suspicious items in connection with the Chinese government. Only the PAP government is in a position to establish such a connection for supporting their conspiracy theories. As a result, my protest will be discredited with patriotism and voters will vote for the PAP. 

My requests

With regard to the 1^st issue, I would appreciate it if the Ministry of Home Affairs promotes the competence of national security officers. I was fully aware Xiu’s Identity shortly after I moved into the flat. Please direct Xiu Chao to return my luggage or state the legal basis of his actions.

With regards to the 2^nd issue, I would appreciate it if the ICA can process my application at its earliest convenience because I have surrendered my passport to the court.

With regard to the 3rdd issue, I would appreciate it if the Minister responds to my suspicion of the espionage by the PAP government.

Thank you.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I)

Complaint about unnecessary efforts by librarians concerning NRIC verification

As of Apr 4, 2020, I haven't received a reply from the National Library Board. On Apr 4, it was announced that all public library would be temporarily closed until May 4. As a result, my complaint has become unnecessary because there is no access to the public library at all. 

From: Yan Jun
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 11:53 AM
To: NLB Quality Service Manager
Cc: PDPC (qsm@imda.gov.sg); Straits Times (stforum@sph.com.sg); Lian He Zao Bao; AGC (AGC@agc.gov.sg); SPF Feedback Shared (SPF) (SPF_Feedback_Shared@spf.gov.sg)
Subject: Clause 23 of the PAPD and a reasonable effort

Dear Riza Rahman,

I refer to your email with regard to the legal basis for librarians’ collection of visitors’ NRIC number, or the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) 2012.

However, what I am complaining about is the unnecessarily duplicative efforts put in by the librarians to ensure the accuracy of visitors’ NRIC numbers. Such an action is against the Clause 23 of the PAPD and has caused serious inconveniences. Clause 23 requires a librarian to put in a reasonable effort but not extra efforts for the purpose of contract tracing.

I still wish to complain about Constance Lerh and Voanne Stewart in Bedok library. Although they were fully aware of my identity by checking my old NRIC, they still repeatedly asked for my NRIC and refused to accept my Passion Card that contained my accurate NRIC number.

The facts

On Mar 28, 2020, Constance Lerh refused to accept my Passion Card as a valid document for verifying my identity on the grounds that a Passion Card didn’t have a photo on it. While the bar code of a Passion Card did represent a person’s accurate NRIC number, Constance Lerh explained that she was unable to make an identity verification with my photo.  

However, she did accept the picture of a NRIC saved in a smartphone. When questioned what document should a visitor who has lost his NRIC produce, she answered a photocopy of the visitor’s NRIC.  In response to my reminder that a photocopy or a picture of a NRIC could be easily manipulated, she answered that act was a crime. I reminded her that the misuse of Passion Card in the current COVID-19 situation equally constituted a crime so she should accept the Passion Card, she didn’t reply. 

With regard to the legal basis for the production of NRIC, Constance Lerh was unable to give an answer. Later Sharon Heng, the manager of Bedok library, told me that the legal basis was the PDPA. Because she was unable to explain how PDPA had authorized the library to check visitors’ NRIC, Sharon Heng promised to email the answer to me later on.

Since the librarians in Bedok had already verified my identity by checking my old NRIC (an invalidated one), I asked whether I was allowed to use my Passion Card in the future. They firmly rejected my request. On Apr 1, librarians Constance Lerh and Voanne Stewart even threatened to stop me from entering the library if I refused to show them my old NRIC.

The issue and the analysis

The current issue is the standard of the care that libraries should apply to ensure the accuracy of visitors’ NRIC numbers.

Clause 23 of the PDPA deals with the accuracy obligation carried out by an organization. It provides that “An organization shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that personal data collected by or on behalf of the organization is accurate and complete, if the personal data (a) is likely to be used by the organization to make a decision that affects the individual to whom the personal data relates; or (b) likely to be disclosed by the organization to another organization.

If a librarian is fully aware of a visitor’s NRIC number, he is not in a position to conduct any verification procedure because he has already fulfilled his duty of care concerning the accuracy of this visitor’s identity. Under the PAPD, a visitor’s only duty is to provide his accurate personal data to a librarian. As for the final verification of a visitor’s NRIC number, it should be done by the police but a librarian in the strictest sense. It clear that most librarians have forgot about their duty to provide members of the public a place to read books. They exercise unnecessarily duplicative efforts for NRIC numbers has caused serious inconveniences.

In my opinion, a Passion Card is acceptable in this situation because most visitors are not liars and would not misuse their Passion Cards. Given the fact that the NRIC number isn’t written on a Passion Card, a librarian can make an identity verification by asking a visitor for his NRIC number instead of a photo verification. What the Personal Data Protection Commission asked for was visitors’ accurate NRIC numbers, which may not be taken from NRIC directly.

In line with my analysis is the requirement for visitors in other public places to fill out the health declaration form. While this requirement is also laid down in accordance the PAPD, visitors are not required to verify his particulars in the declaration form with his NRIC.

My request

I would appreciate it if the National Library Board takes my complaint seriously and reply to me. Please do forward my email and your reply to Bedok and Tampines library so I can avoid bitter arguments with them. Both managers and the librarian in Bedok and Tampines librarians are aware of me and my request.

I understand that the library management may not even think about the level of care librarians should exercise for collecting accurate visitors’ NRIC number. In fact, even police officers were unable to answer similar questions.

My intention

My intention is to eliminate unnecessary efforts made by librarians for the accuracy of NRIC numbers. NRIC certainly is the best option for identity verification but is not the only way.

I believe very few people would make reasonable effort to correct the librarians’ mistake. For that reason, I copy this letter to the PDPC, the Straits Times, Lian He Zao Bao, the AGC, and the Police. I think the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) needs to pay attention to the issue raised in this email.

Thank you. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,

Yan Jun

(S7684361I)

From: NLB Quality Service Manager [mailto:qsm@nlb.gov.sg]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 10:51 AM
To: Medp1128@hotmail.com
Subject: RR2003005671: Feedback on PassionCard and PDPA NLB:0014005937

Dear Mr Yan Jun,

We refer to your feedback provided to staff during your visit to the Bedok Public Library on 28 March 2020. Your comments have also been shared with our management team. 

In view of the evolving COVID-19 situation, temperature taking and the taking down of personal particulars have been implemented as precautionary measures for the safety of our patrons. As contact tracing requires a high degree of accuracy, the NRIC or a photo ID is required.

Patrons are advised to present their photo ID cards to facilitate this and the information is displayed on our website www.nlb.gov.sg and social media platforms.

We would also like to share that it is stated on the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) website (https://www.ifaq.gov.sg/PDPC/apps/Fcd_faqmain.aspx#FAQ_2110433), that organisations may collect personal data of visitors to premises for purposes of contact tracing and other response measures in the event of an emergency such as during the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In the event of a COVID-19 case, personal data can be collected, used and disclosed without consent to carry out contact tracing and other response measures, pursuant to sections 1(b) of the Second, Third and Fourth Schedules to the PDPA, as this is necessary to respond to an emergency that threatens the life, health or safety of other individuals. As organisations may require national identification numbers to accurately identify individuals in the event of a COVID-19 case, organisations may collect visitors’ NRIC, FIN or passport numbers for this purpose. 

We seek your understanding and cooperation so that together, we can curb any further spread of the COVID-19 to the community, and make our libraries a safe environment for all.

Regards,

Riza Rahman

Officer

Quality Service Management

National Library Board.